doc0 - 1.6, 1.7/2.3
This commit is contained in:
@@ -120,24 +120,79 @@ Here you can see:
|
||||
|
||||
## 1.6 Collect "Fresh" Firmware Dump
|
||||
|
||||
As the lock has been tampered with before, the FW dump is not entirely "fresh."
|
||||
The device has been tampered with before, therefore there is no fresh dump available.
|
||||
|
||||
## 1.7 && 2.3 Initial setup
|
||||
|
||||
The initial setup is done using the Shelly App. The capture can be found [here](captures/init.pcapng).
|
||||
|
||||
Unsure which IP address is most relevant, here are all Shelly-like or LOQED-like addresses:
|
||||
- `34.62.47.252`: changelog-backend.shelly.cloud0
|
||||
- `34.95.90.149`: control.shelly.cloud
|
||||
- `104.155.32.247`: shelly-120-eu.shelly.cloud
|
||||
- `34.155.200.196`: integrations.loqed.com
|
||||
- `35.205.173.252`: app-ratings.shelly.cloud, paypal.shelly.cloud, shelly-infra1-eu.shelly.cloud
|
||||
- `34.79.5.199`: shelly-101-eu.shelly.cloud
|
||||
- `35.241.201.25`: repo.shelly.cloud
|
||||
|
||||
For the PreTester analysis, I chose control.shelly.cloud, as I suspect the lock to communicate to a cloud via the bridge.
|
||||
As the bridge has a built in ESP32 supporting WiFi, I suspect the communication looks as follows:
|
||||
|
||||
<img src="img/sequence_diagram.png" alt="PlantUML sequence diagram of suspected communication flow" width="400">
|
||||
|
||||
The [PreTester report](pretester_reports/init_report.md) didn't find anything unusual.
|
||||
It reported no critical or high findings.
|
||||
|
||||
### Old Initial Setup Capture
|
||||
|
||||
You can also find an older initial setup capture made by Manu [here](captures/old_init.pcapng).
|
||||
I tested this in the PreTester as well using integrations.loqed.com, as this seemed to be the most present IP in the capture.
|
||||
|
||||
The [report](pretester_reports/old_init_report.md) can be found here.
|
||||
Once again, it reported no critical or high findings.
|
||||
|
||||
> The old init capture supposedly was the first real fresh setup. As mentioned, the lock has been tempered with before.
|
||||
|
||||
### URLs and Endpoints
|
||||
|
||||
I used the PreTester to probe all URLs and endpoints, here are some (interesting) findings:
|
||||
|
||||
|Endpoint|Ports|TLS|Cipher|
|
||||
|:-|:-|:-|:-|
|
||||
|app-ratings.shelly.cloud|22, 80, 443, 8000|v1.2|ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384|
|
||||
|changelog-backend.shelly.cloud|22, 80, 443|v1.2|ECDHE-ECDSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384|
|
||||
|control.shelly.cloud|22, 80|v1.3|TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384|
|
||||
|integrations.loqed.com|80, 443, 8080|v1.3|TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256|
|
||||
|paypal.shelly.cloud|22, 80, 443, 8000|v1.3|ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384|
|
||||
|repo.shelly.cloud|22, 80, 443|v1.3|TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384|
|
||||
|shelly-101-eu.shelly.cloud|22, 80, 443, **31234**|v1.3|TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384|
|
||||
|shelly-120-eu.shelly.cloud|22, 80, 443, **6113**|v1.3|TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384|
|
||||
|shelly-infra1-eu.shelly.cloud|22, 80, 443, 8000, **9443**|v1.2|ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384|
|
||||
|api.production.loqed.com|80, 443, 8080|v1.3|TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256|
|
||||
|mqtt.production.loqed.com|80, 443, 8080, **8883**|v1.3|TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256|
|
||||
|
||||
> Includes the old init.
|
||||
|
||||
## 1.8 Collect Firmware Dump of Firmware after initial Setup
|
||||
|
||||
### Bridge
|
||||
|
||||
### Outer Module
|
||||
|
||||
## 1.7 && 2.3 Initial setup
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
## 1.8 Collect Firmware Dump of Firmware after initial Setup
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
## 1.9 && 2.4 Firmware Update
|
||||
|
||||
## 1.10 Collect Updated Firmware Dump
|
||||
|
||||
### Bridge
|
||||
|
||||
### Outer Module
|
||||
|
||||
## 1.11 Collect Firmware Dump after Factory Reset
|
||||
|
||||
### Bridge
|
||||
|
||||
### Outer Module
|
||||
|
||||
## 1.12 (Optional for now) Instantiate Device Model
|
||||
|
||||
## 1.13 Collect App APKs
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user